ILEA Criminal Law Practice Exam – Complete Prep Resource

To be charged with inappropriate communication with a child, it is essential to establish that there was an intent to arouse either party sexually. This requirement is grounded in laws that seek to protect children from sexual exploitation and abuse. The rationale is to ensure that any communication that could be deemed inappropriate is not merely incidental or innocuous, but rather has a specific intention behind it.

The intent to arouse sexually signifies a more serious violation of boundaries and reflects an understanding of the implications such communication holds. This makes option B crucial, as it highlights the necessity of establishing this specific intent to substantiate the charge of inappropriate communication.

While other aspects of the law may consider factors like the means of communication or the involvement of third parties, these do not directly address the core nature of the offense, which focuses on the intent behind the communication. Therefore, without the explicit intent to sexually arouse, charges may not hold weight under the law.